From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80738CE6 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2018 11:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EFD58B for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2018 11:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 13:34:11 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Message-ID: <20180908113411.GA3111@kroah.com> References: <20180908082141.15d72684@coco.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180908082141.15d72684@coco.lan> Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Handling of embargoed security issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 08:21:41AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > IMHO, the best would be to have a formal/legal way to handle it. No, sorry, some of us are not allowed legally to sign NDAs for stuff like this. So keeping legal out of is it the best solution and we have done that pretty well so far. thanks, greg k-h