From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC12AAEF for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 20:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.26.193]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AF9B42D for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 20:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 22:15:18 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg KH Message-ID: <20180715201518.GA19675@amd> References: <20180501163818.GD1468@sasha-vm> <20180501194450.GD10479@thunk.org> <20180501200019.GA7397@sasha-vm> <20180501205448.GE10479@thunk.org> <20180501220228.GD7397@sasha-vm> <20180502043017.GA11938@1wt.eu> <20180502194139.GA18390@sasha-vm> <20180502200229.GA12729@1wt.eu> <20180714173812.xhfwtcijlxebmn2k@devuan> <20180715085403.GA21992@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180715085403.GA21992@kroah.com> Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] bug-introducing patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun 2018-07-15 10:54:03, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 07:38:12PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > >=20 > > > > The way I see it, if a commit can get one or two tested-by, it's a = good > > > > alternative to a week in -next. > > >=20 >=20 > Pavel, I "love" how you fail to point out that you are responding to a 2 > month old thread :( >=20 > And that thread was beaten to death, and still you want to revise it, > which is odd to me, perhaps you just don't like stable releases? Given > that you never mark any of the patches for your subsystem for stable > releases, why do you care about how they are maintained? I do mark patches -- acording to stable kernel rules. But you are apparently using different rules, not written anywhere, and I get complains when I don't mark patches according to _those_. But this was supposed to be about testing. And I'd like to see Tested: no/compile headers, instead. [And yes, motivation for this was that broken LED patches were merged to stable without any testing, and when that was questioned, I was told that testing was not performed because it would require unusual hardware called "USB keyboard".] Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAltLq1YACgkQMOfwapXb+vJ/4ACgsOGbawFAbEXJ2EfBdN5W5Ltq rtsAn2oKuVsakR8nWQM97UFoBtsYEH8A =akRE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--