From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8CF9C8E for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 21:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 372C54DA for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 21:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:20:57 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Bart Van Assche Message-ID: <20171030212057.GB7379@kroah.com> References: <20171029100816.pmq5dpmck4cclmdw@thunk.org> <1509385352.3660.35.camel@wdc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1509385352.3660.35.camel@wdc.com> Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Maintainer's Summit 2017 Feedback Thread List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 05:42:33PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Sun, 2017-10-29 at 06:08 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > Please reply to this thread if you have any comments about how we can > > organize the Maintainer's Summit for next year. Given that Linus > > seemed fairly happy with how things went, it's likely we will stick > > with the same format for next year, but if there are any details about > > how we could do things better, I'd greatly appreciate them. > > Something Linus was very clear about is that regressions are not acceptable. > The best way I know to reduce the number of regressions is to increase the > efforts on automatic testing. Should the number of tests that is run by the > zero-day testing infrastructure be increased? Should more tests be added? Are there tests out there that 0-day does not currently run? If there are any out there that 0-day should run that it does not, you can always add new ones, the 0-day client code is on github... > Should the documentation that is available on > https://01.org/lkp/documentation/0-day-test-service perhaps be moved > elsewhere, e.g. inside that repository? Do we need a link on kernel.org or > in the kernel documentation to that project? 0-day is just one of the many different test systems for the kernel, should we add links to them all? :) thanks, greg k-h