Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Maintainer's Summit 2017 Feedback Thread

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 05:42:33PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-10-29 at 06:08 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > Please reply to this thread if you have any comments about how we can
> > organize the Maintainer's Summit for next year.  Given that Linus
> > seemed fairly happy with how things went, it's likely we will stick
> > with the same format for next year, but if there are any details about
> > how we could do things better, I'd greatly appreciate them.
> 
> Something Linus was very clear about is that regressions are not acceptable.
> The best way I know to reduce the number of regressions is to increase the
> efforts on automatic testing. Should the number of tests that is run by the
> zero-day testing infrastructure be increased? Should more tests be added?

Are there tests out there that 0-day does not currently run?  If there
are any out there that 0-day should run that it does not, you can always
add new ones, the 0-day client code is on github...

> Should the documentation that is available on
> https://01.org/lkp/documentation/0-day-test-service perhaps be moved
> elsewhere, e.g. inside that repository? Do we need a link on kernel.org or
> in the kernel documentation to that project?

0-day is just one of the many different test systems for the kernel,
should we add links to them all?  :)

thanks,

greg k-h