From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACEA8CD7 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 19:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap.thunk.org (imap.thunk.org [74.207.234.97]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45F0C175 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 19:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:41:30 -0400 From: Theodore Ts'o To: Laura Abbott Message-ID: <20171030194130.mzkd6zvxuxoumx6k@thunk.org> References: <20171029101257.wgujjxh7ert3lxl2@thunk.org> <5a569d45-ef78-3ab6-1926-2359ffb2ddb9@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5a569d45-ef78-3ab6-1926-2359ffb2ddb9@redhat.com> Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Kernel Summit 2017 Feedback Thread List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 08:26:01AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > > What ended up happening in the unconference anyway? I mostly didn't > think about it but part of that was not knowing what was being > discussed. I get the nature of the unconference makes it hard to > plan ahead but there didn't seem to be a good way to know what was > being discussed. There was one unconference slot used this year, and it was a continuation of the Linux security discussion. People were supposed to post proposals to the ksummit-discuss list, but this didn't seem to work very well this year compared to last year in Santa Fe (where roughly half of the unconference slots were used). It could have been that between KVM Forum, ELC, and OSS Europe, there was simply less of a need for more kernel-oriented discussions. One of the things I've thought about doing for next year is to set up a wiki page to make it easier for people to sign up slots. - Ted