From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E7ADA73 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap.thunk.org (imap.thunk.org [74.207.234.97]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80F73463 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 17:22:10 -0400 From: Theodore Ts'o To: Mathieu Desnoyers Message-ID: <20171020212210.j5cmyr5ow3shog5g@thunk.org> References: <705984629.45722.1508507370842.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <705984629.45722.1508507370842.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Cc: ksummit-discuss Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Kernel Summit agenda: Restartable Sequences List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 01:49:30PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Hi Ted, > > I know it's a bit late to add stuff to the agenda, but I did > very significant progress regarding Restartable Sequences in the > past weeks. (I basically found and implemented a neat way to > handle single-stepping) > > You have probably seen the resulting LKML thread: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/12/846 > > It could be relevant to have a slot for this within KS if there > is room in the schedule. Sure, I've scheduled a slot on Tuesday afternoon. - Ted