On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 06:51:42PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 04:05:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Trees can be added to kernelci, yes.  Another approach would be to work
> > out a workflow with the upstreams that makes this better, if they'd take
> > pull requests for example.

> Isn't the goal of this topic in maintainers summit? Improving workflows :)

It's also the goal here!

> So, my way to overcome my issues was to add "parallel" tree and to stop
> crying about "long queues".

So I guess what everyone is suggesting here is changing this from being
a parallel tree to a tree that's part of the normal workflow for this
code.