From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7684B2F for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66DF0133 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 18:51:42 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Mark Brown Message-ID: <20170714155142.GF1528@mtr-leonro.local> References: <1498758126.2834.70.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20170629182044.GP21846@wotan.suse.de> <20170630062717.534b06e9@canb.auug.org.au> <20170714040447.GT1528@mtr-leonro.local> <20170714095409.GF2269@kroah.com> <20170714102920.GY1528@mtr-leonro.local> <20170714141057.GC21743@lunn.ch> <20170714150550.ubtkwmd3wcx554m6@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bXVaen7Op4LYXSUn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170714150550.ubtkwmd3wcx554m6@sirena.org.uk> Cc: James Bottomley , ksummit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Developing across multiple areas of the kernel List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --bXVaen7Op4LYXSUn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 04:05:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 04:10:57PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > The difference in maintainers style between netdev and RDMA causes to have long queue > > > (100+) of patches posted to the ML [2], which are not cross-checked in various CIs. > > > It is possible to get 0-day to run against any arbitrary git tree, if > > you ask nicely. If same is true for the kernel-ci project. So if you > > are willing to do the merge work, you can get it tested. > > Trees can be added to kernelci, yes. Another approach would be to work > out a workflow with the upstreams that makes this better, if they'd take > pull requests for example. Isn't the goal of this topic in maintainers summit? Improving workflows :) So, my way to overcome my issues was to add "parallel" tree and to stop crying about "long queues". Thanks --bXVaen7Op4LYXSUn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEkhr/r4Op1/04yqaB5GN7iDZyWKcFAllo6I4ACgkQ5GN7iDZy WKet+Q//dC7RujKQetYBpeREme3Aa/qJwvkqzWoqc0FznyfcNUBi8/yCulF45I6c ZBiARHhIjfLhRwq/HCgDC9oj1ATfS7yTQHsg0szm/R3oYmJsNo1ZNa9c+WC3YaLG 2f42Kj2xFoCBNWWFGtLHBlnnWaVinoDM0OymN/vafwLATkf+5l6ncw9gC2hDGzDT kOG/He95fOITg+LPhvdYfdn+NZWDFouYakosIR8yYlzmQzuWGaaYXxB24m4ywnv9 Fp60+ksBZkSZtidC4n6frASNAM6q62zsR2JrKnQ9itHRogfZWZDT2Yfjx3JtEZoQ /QEeUv0JtAiLKcHBKCluJCUkx4AUgG7wIsjRZyyzKSNw1kOHkHoLN0FbznngT2T4 v+Ugj4smL2AkoWWLH+aO4RsRDXlsHMUkEz+gTbac/927yxL15PQaQcw3T2oWI6dl HF045JliXrRzHoyS/5AzPSiN/sSFOHr6/F2FDRuO/X3v0KJBNCcb4pjGQRwn7u3g sYE6gLy9AO0i5/yUHcVXzNsjwRgymZ1ZhlwY0TXoziyEE4u/spqPZRF/B5qQ1Rie Th2kGDf6xDpDNsTJ2n2/D0j/0blzoVDcCXhyrYuPOXgxC7RkF/t3cXPQjUzIbaUE 1ktWVCUU++fz+yZB8Xw2XU0TrTMUYHcbZCGMQhLsv1gbxZIq26k= =CjbH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bXVaen7Op4LYXSUn--