From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B69938D7 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 06:42:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prv3-mh.provo.novell.com (prv3-mh.provo.novell.com [137.65.250.26]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FC30AC for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 06:42:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 08:21:32 +0200 From: Valentin Rothberg To: Linus Torvalds Message-ID: <20170711062132.GA13470@nebuchadnezzar.suse.de> References: <20170627135839.GB1886@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20170706144028.46a2mt2mdzpt6ip7@mwanda> <20170707113650.ee6oys5u4vq5hgdi@mwanda> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F613009A7@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> <20170710173335.4ksnso6dzaekoxz4@piout.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Dan Carpenter , ksummit , Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] is Kconfig a bit hard sometimes? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Jul 10 '17 11:28, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Alexandre Belloni > wrote: > > > > I know the yes trick works for kernels older than 3.7 but maybe people > > should start using make olddefconfig ;) > > Honestly, I wish more people just ran "oldconfig" and then started > complaining about people adding insane Kconfig options. If you want, we could add a "--diff-options" to checkkconfigsymbols.py. It runs reasonably fast and would also report options outside the current architecture. Kind regards, Valentin