On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 07:00:52AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 10:05:29PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 11:37:12AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > > > > > Great, so why are we continuing to allow patches with MODULE_VERSION and > > > > DRIVER_VERSION changes? > > > > > > I suspect they just haven't caused problems elsewhere. > > > > > > And honestly, they aren't that common. Grepping for MODULE_VERSION and > > > DRIVER_VERSION shows more than I would like, but we're talking > > > hundreds, not thousands (and lots of them are basically dead, stale > > > code - ATA etc, or just joke names - usb). > > > > I see it differently, from my point of view, it is pretty active, > > especially in the subsystems where new drivers are added more often, > > It takes a few years for companies to realize that the version numbers > mean nothing. So give it time, it will slow down. Or you can just > delete all of them at once, making it easier for you in the end. OK, let's start in small scale and limit myself to MODULE_VERSION at this stage. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9808651/ Thanks > > thanks, > > greg k-h