From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B6FBB77 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 23:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (relay7-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.200]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24893170 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 23:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:36:24 -0700 From: Josh Triplett To: Jiri Kosina Message-ID: <20170419233624.ga4oodno3lqyoa5c@x> References: <20170418181506.30de0470@vento.lan> <20170419163636.6747a232@lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: ksummit , Dave Airlie , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Doug Ledford , David Miller Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] "Maintainer summit" invitation discussion List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:41:04AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > > We're also a ways into the Sphinx transition; I would be most curious to > > hear how others think it is going and whether/how the process should > > continue. > > There is one piece of feedback I guess I can share right away on this -- > I've heard so many complaints that Doc/kern-par completion > stopped to yield Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt that it's not really > funny any more :) Is there any good reason we don't check in symlinks from the old location to the new location, considering that the new version remains readable in text form? ln -sf Documentation/process/coding-style.rst Documentation/CodingStyle ln -s Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt ... Commit 852d21ae1fcdf0e4de6b5bfa730d29cb013c7ff3 already did this for one such relocated file.