From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85E98BD8 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 22:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86CA3FF for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 22:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:36:36 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Message-ID: <20170419163636.6747a232@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20170418181506.30de0470@vento.lan> References: <20170418181506.30de0470@vento.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: ksummit , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Dave Airlie , Doug Ledford , David Miller Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] "Maintainer summit" invitation discussion List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:15:06 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > There is one particular issue that occurs to me, although I'm not sure > if it would fit on the new "maintainer summit" format: it is related > to how to group documentation. Also, this is actually Jon's call, but > I suspect that he may want to hear comments from the others. I could imagine talking about a few documentation issues, including interactions with the rest of the kernel. Who has responsibility for taking docs patches is often not clear, leading to multiple maintainers picking them up or conflicts between trees. We're also a ways into the Sphinx transition; I would be most curious to hear how others think it is going and whether/how the process should continue. jon