From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AC4A40D for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2.hallyn.com (h2.hallyn.com [78.46.35.8]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 058E5D5 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:27:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 10:27:23 -0500 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Tejun Heo Message-ID: <20161030152723.GA27915@mail.hallyn.com> References: <20161027200929.GB17657@htj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161027200929.GB17657@htj.duckdns.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [LAST-MINUTE TOPIC] cgroup API List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 04:09:29PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > (cc'ing Johannes) > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:29:01AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Would it make sense to have a session to try to resolve the current > > cgroup v2 API disagreement? > > > > In the interest of brevity, I'm not going to rehash the issues here, > > but in extremely short summary, they include tasks in non-leaf cgroups > > as well as whether threads in the same process can be in different > > cgroups. > > Yeah, sure. Do we have some time on Mon evening? I'm not sure I'll > be around Tue evening. FWIW I'm only arriving tuesday morning; but obviously far more important that Tejun be there, so I think I vote for monday night.