On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:14:37PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:45:48AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > If things don't work out with what you're doing with the preannouncement
> > it might be good to comment on that that and say you intend to do
> > something different next year, but hopefully everything will be fine of
> > course.

> So Greg has already said that if people abuse the preannouncement by
> trying to push obviously unready code into 4.9 to comply with
> enterprise distributions requirements that features have to be

Sure, and what I'm saying is that or it otherwise doesn't seem to have
worked well then talking about it and how that affects the plans for
next year would be good.