From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 10:34:39 +0200 From: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" To: Theodore Ts'o Message-ID: <20160904083439.GA18194@kroah.com> References: <57C78BE9.30009@linaro.org> <20160902012531.GB28461@sasha-lappy> <20160902095417.GJ3950@sirena.org.uk> <1472827326.2519.14.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20160904001031.t7sv5isw5tc46pxr@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160904001031.t7sv5isw5tc46pxr@thunk.org> Cc: James Bottomley , "ltsi-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [Stable kernel] feature backporting collaboration List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 08:10:31PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > If it reduces the number of massive features that have to be > backported to 4.4, it might be that pushing them to use 4.7 (or > waiting for the next LTS kernel, which should hopefully be coming soon > anyway) The next "LTS" kernel will be 4.9. thanks, greg k-h