On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 04:16:20PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 08:56:30AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> > Sounds good. Let me know if you end up having to add a 'depends on ARM'
> > dependency anywhere, as that might indicate that we are doing something
> > different on ARM that should be done in a more generic way.

> Only one thing :)

> Arm seems to define NO_IRQ. This is not available in other arch and one
> driver (moxart-dma) is using it. I don't see why this should be arm specific.

> FWIW, now I have a single arm config like x86, ppc, mips for my subsystem with
> this change.

The general direction here is to not use NO_IRQ in new code.