From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DCC5360 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.free-electrons.com (down.free-electrons.com [37.187.137.238]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB51143 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:28:49 +0200 From: Maxime Ripard To: Arnd Bergmann Message-ID: <20160831092849.GB14379@lukather> References: <20160826193331.GA29084@jra3> <201608301733.36149.arnd@arndb.de> <20160830160450.GC26785@roeck-us.net> <201608302144.40679.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EY/WZ/HvNxOox07X" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201608302144.40679.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: "Bradley M. Kuhn" , Linus Torvalds , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] GPL defense issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --EY/WZ/HvNxOox07X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 09:44:40PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 30 August 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 05:33:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > >=20 > > > > Anyway, like I was saying, no one from Linaro ever contributed > > > > something meaningful (except some cross-tree patches, and the usual > > > > "maintainance" patches). > > >=20 > > > I'm not surprised at all. Most of the kernel work we do in > > > Linaro is intentionally cross-platform (so it benefits all members > > > equally), or it is done on those platforms that the members decide > > > are important upstream. > > >=20 > > One may wonder how your Linux kernel patches and merges are classified > > per the above. > > > > Thank you for all your work in the Linux kernel. It is anything but > > meaningless, and it obviously goes far beyond "some cross-tree patches, > > and the usual maintenance patches". >=20 > I'm sure Maxime was specifically referring to mach-sunxi specific code > here, but it's clear how that could be interpreted differently, or > taken out of context. Yeah, sorry, I wasn't try to reduce or deny the huge amount of work Linaro is doing on the whole kernel. My point was just that, on the Allwinner specific code, all the work done was on code that was already there, not on any new code. Which doesn't prevent us from using a lot of Linaro code everywhere. Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com --EY/WZ/HvNxOox07X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXxqNRAAoJEBx+YmzsjxAgdToQALROjZxF7lc9NdoxC+lIyBlg MEGg/Ld99ERglBMMxsNLrP5tUxw9b1UTpvrxjx2kn1WnIwAYTxW9v+JUE/T0bjXy RW0oG1wn+/BntyK81cDeeS1H+R4bXVyndBXqsv3TZek/F8g4js0dTbjwx17QNR3M XMi0rFi4iIT0KCwbxgxiqwCsxpLNfi/WKGDvVnkO3YvDFsq3zO/hsj/W84qg84F8 2E3Y3k1rJd5I9rEHEVuHEHX86e3Cm7wwFHz6i8/Q72vJrWA9cK/EYJ7KGDHgr0Ma d6vasCE5tRFsT+5HyeZIQ1+IsfpY+ur/+UxPrT+dQlzLGYG4JQLWLPeSEtngnaLm 2f84wmPy13nx5gjHBZHpt0OrOVeTT6jlXzt5rTzfcs8TV5mYdExqMHhZ77gmBAFs VkWMm9QJKlMTBsYLujFowY7HcyTgJ5f0hA8B2b/ygZ2JjRLERj1aFHL8t9IC4cmX kAlSXY8vRxbRLrEYzvg1Q9W73vntcr8WZ57jh2lJJdgxz5+ducgG4GX2jDudXfVA VmijKtrHGG3BGaflAoP9siU5b9hEWHGZoGZg0JLmPtkmAwhBnwWU1XZ57pw53pFR zKzxI2C0K+HO6dDMYv13n+5uaFYkssqTuVy0UWw9qn4OExW18scbtQvd4NPQdJ3/ ZEzEVIaJ6CFIr3pVlsR5 =aMjY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EY/WZ/HvNxOox07X--