From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32DD9256 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 04:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hr2.samba.org (hr2.samba.org [144.76.82.148]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90B1017D for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 04:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 21:34:01 -0700 From: Jeremy Allison To: Steven Rostedt Message-ID: <20160828043401.GB8742@jeremy-acer> Reply-To: Jeremy Allison References: <20160826193331.GA29084@jra3> <87inunxf14.fsf@ebb.org> <20160827162655.GB27132@kroah.com> <20160827230210.GA6717@jeremy-acer> <20160827225842.3f93f26d@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160827225842.3f93f26d@gandalf.local.home> Cc: "Bradley M. Kuhn" , Linus Torvalds , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] GPL defense issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:58:42PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > I'm not sure Greg's answer is really "never". But I think this is > similar to the analogy of dealing with rogue nations. Going to war is It seemed pretty clear to me that Greg's answer was that there was no possible situation where he would countenance an enforcement lawsuit against a GPL violator. I really don't want to put words in anyones mouth or misread their intent so if I am mistaken or misread what he wrote I'd love to be corrected here.