From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB445722
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:55:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from omzsmtpe01.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe01.verizonbusiness.com
	[199.249.25.210])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 310D11E8
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:55:37 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Levin, Alexander" <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:55:30 -0400
Message-ID: <20160826185530.GG25341@sasha-lappy>
References: <20160826044651.GA25341@sasha-lappy>
	<20160826112635.GA27627@kroah.com>
	<c87b9e9ad009d259f500637851f18f91@newmail.lip6.fr>
In-Reply-To: <c87b9e9ad009d259f500637851f18f91@newmail.lip6.fr>
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
	<ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, "Levin,
	Alexander" <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Self nomination - Sasha Levin
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 08:08:49AM -0400, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Le 26.08.2016 13:26, Greg KH a =E9crit=A0:
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:46:51AM -0400, Levin, Alexander wrote:
> >>    - Making checkpatch check for (some) of the stable kernel rules
> >>    (and possibly recommend adding the stable@ tag in certain cases?).
> >>      - Depends on: making checkpatch sane again.
> >=20
> > This sounds interesting.  What do you mean by "sane"?  "sane" as in
> > rewriting it so that someone who isn't a perl master can modify it?  Or
> > "sane" as in "don't be so pedantic about things that don't matter"?
>=20
> Wouldn't that require interpreting the log message as well?

It already does.

--=20

Thanks,
Sasha=