From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 808E626C for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D79D190 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 05:33:20 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: James Bottomley Message-ID: <20160826123320.GA28496@infradead.org> References: <20160824130832.GA28564@kroah.com> <1472052583.61594.577.camel@infradead.org> <20160824174724.GE30853@kroah.com> <20160824205011.GA31615@ebb.org> <20160824215447.GA5368@kroah.com> <20160825040619.GA32072@ebb.org> <1472213036.5189.37.camel@HansenPartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1472213036.5189.37.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: "Bradley M. Kuhn" , Linus Torvalds , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] GPL defense issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I've been trying to ignore this stupid flame war, but.. > Thanks to the ruling you've landed us with in Germany, it does appear > that this means you actually don't have any standing to enforce GPL for > the Linux kernel .... and now neither do the rest of us. Event despite lots of help Bradley and the Conservancy this is my case, and I have lost the first instance. I really don't want incorrect statements like this rest on a mailing list with a public archive.