From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 13:26:35 +0200 From: Greg KH To: "Levin, Alexander" Message-ID: <20160826112635.GA27627@kroah.com> References: <20160826044651.GA25341@sasha-lappy> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160826044651.GA25341@sasha-lappy> Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Self nomination - Sasha Levin List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:46:51AM -0400, Levin, Alexander wrote: > - Making checkpatch check for (some) of the stable kernel rules > (and possibly recommend adding the stable@ tag in certain cases?). > - Depends on: making checkpatch sane again. This sounds interesting. What do you mean by "sane"? "sane" as in rewriting it so that someone who isn't a perl master can modify it? Or "sane" as in "don't be so pedantic about things that don't matter"? > - Improving tagging for stable. The "version tag" option is broken > and the "Fixes:" tag is always preferable, how do we get people to > use that more often? (script it somehow? > scripts/find-version-it-fixes ?). Oh a script like that would be nice, but how would that work in reality? thanks, greg k-h