From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A06A771 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 22:32:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44D2B19B for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 22:32:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 15:32:38 -0700 From: Darren Hart To: Steven Rostedt Message-ID: <20160805223238.GA4952@f23x64.localdomain> References: <20151013124230.1a082d28@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151013124230.1a082d28@gandalf.local.home> Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Mainlining PREEMPT_RT List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:42:30PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Now that it was announced in Dublin last week that mainlining > PREEMPT_RT has funding, I would like to propose a tech topic to discuss > what is needed to be done in the near future. > > Thomas Gleixner and his minions will be doing the brunt of the work, > but there's issues that need to be addressed with the rest of the > kernel. The various topics would include: > > CPU hotplug > preempt_disable and local_irq_disable annotations > new timer_wheel implementation > simple waitqueues > trylock boosting > > Several of the Real Time developers will be present at kernel summit. I > think this would be a great opportunity to have them be able to sit > down together and discuss the remaining issues. I'm very interested in participating in this. Is this a TECH topic or a CORE topic? -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center