From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (smtp2.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.36]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A23371 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0122.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.122]) by smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77D441DABD for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by smtpgrave08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945312122C6 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 15:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 11:40:58 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Takashi Iwai Message-ID: <20160804114058.3e0836ea@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <3268954.rXb0BJAX6c@vostro.rjw.lan> <87oa5aqjmq.fsf@intel.com> <20160803110935.GA26270@kroah.com> <87a8guq9y8.fsf@intel.com> <20160803132607.GA31662@kroah.com> <1470232658.2482.42.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1470233095.2482.46.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20160803212332.576bb718@grimm.local.home> <20160804082018.GA27204@kroah.com> <20160804093355.30096bbe@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: James Bottomley , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] stable workflow List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 17:32:48 +0200 Takashi Iwai wrote: > Agreed that it's a good practice. But what if a fix isn't a > regression fix? Many stable patches are trivial ones like PCI ID > additions. > > We may point any of the commit to the corresponding code, but does it > make sense at all? I agree that non-bug fixes don't need the Fixes tag. Because a missing PCI ID is not a bug fix, it really is an enhancement (supporting new hardware). Those are fine. -- Steve