From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 592BC89C for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 09:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6EB17B for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 09:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:34:27 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Paul Burton Message-ID: <20160801093417.GA11119@leverpostej> References: <3aa8df3e-3705-9fd5-640c-37c0be2af561@imgtec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3aa8df3e-3705-9fd5-640c-37c0be2af561@imgtec.com> Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Jann Horn Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [nominations] kernel hardening / self-protection / whatever List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 10:55:29AM +0100, Paul Burton wrote: > It would be interesting to hear from people focused on security what > their requirements, current & coming soon, from arch code are. I'd be interested in this, and I think it would also be worth having: - Ard Biesheuvel - Laura Abbott Who have both done work on various protection improvements for arm/arm64 (e.g. DEBUG_RODATA & KASLR), and generic infrastructure pieces (e.g. LKDTM). Thanks, Mark.