From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 063AF723 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB3B241 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 23:02:15 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Fengguang Wu Message-ID: <20160731173214.GO9681@localhost> References: <20160725190125.GS5537@wotan.suse.de> <5486315.Z6uhQZYKqJ@avalon> <20160728205324.GB5642@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <2443703.ScQNYO34Bz@avalon> <20160728230713.GB18980@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <20160728233327.GC3296@wotan.suse.de> <20160729000912.GA17232@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <20160730170556.GR3296@wotan.suse.de> <20160731063558.GA3493@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160731063558.GA3493@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> Cc: Vegard Nossum , Wenzhong Sun , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Nominating Fengguang Wu - 0-day List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 02:35:58PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > >How about linux-next ? > > linux-next could be perfectly supported, however in a different > "rebase" way than the "merges" for RC kernels. > > Suppose there are 100 branches based on -rc2 and another 100 branches > on -rc3. We can typically merge most of the 200 branches onto -rc3, > since there are relatively few changes between -rc2 and -rc3. Since linux-next already contains all maintainer branches slated for -next, merging that won't help much and seems tedious. I think 0day should just runs tests on top of linux-next everyday and report, if not done already. -- ~Vinod