From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AF828FC for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 23:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6397156 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 23:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 16:53:13 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: "Wangnan (F)" Message-ID: <20160729235313.GA31421@linux-80c1.suse> References: <20160727232054.GA30998@linux-80c1.suse> <579AF4EF.6070605@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <579AF4EF.6070605@huawei.com> Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] self nomination List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Wangnan (F) wrote: >Yes, we need a performance related session. I posted a proposal but >not very responsive. > >I can talk about tracing and tools/perf, especially the progress of >BPF. We can discuss something about performance profiling based on >these tracing result. Fair enough, although I was referring to something a little more tangible, such as specific pressure points and bottlenecks in (hopefully) real workloads/systems. In the past this has worked well, and some issues that have been brought to our attention have been addressed. Like others already said, this obviously requires enough interest and content; so other performance related topics could fit as well. Thanks, Davidlohr