From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 634B892B
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:35:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net
	[217.70.183.194])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AE3B257
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:35:06 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 07:34:59 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20160729143459.GA11814@x>
References: <20160729131151.GF4340@x> <20160729075039.GA26402@x>
	<30809.1469794812@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
	<1596.1469801212@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1596.1469801212@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a
 patch series over time
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 03:06:52PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> wrote:
> 
> > Note that git-series doesn't provide a quilt-style push/pop workflow,
> > with applied and unapplied patches; it just looks at HEAD.
> 
> Ah...  In that case it's probably not a sufficient substitute for how I use
> stgit.

Fair enough.  I normally manipulate patches via "git rebase -i".

You could use the two together, though, if you'd like to track the
history you've changed with stgit.  You'd just need to make sure you'd
applied all the patches before doing a git series commit.

- Josh Triplett