From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED8472C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 23:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 912C4A1 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 23:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 01:33:27 +0200 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Fengguang Wu Message-ID: <20160728233327.GC3296@wotan.suse.de> References: <20160725190125.GS5537@wotan.suse.de> <5486315.Z6uhQZYKqJ@avalon> <20160728205324.GB5642@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <2443703.ScQNYO34Bz@avalon> <20160728230713.GB18980@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160728230713.GB18980@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Nominating Fengguang Wu - 0-day List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 07:07:13AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > btw, maybe some maintainers are already informed: 0-day statistics > show that ~60% errors can be reported in 2 hours, ~90% errors are > reported in 24 hours and there are 1% errors reported after 1 week. If one were to take 0-day code an slap it on some internal big-iron server, and prioritize work for a few developers (say SUSE would do this for its developers) do you expect the turnaround time for reports would be faster if we had bigger-meaner hardware ? These days actually would like to get results back in a few minutes for 90% of errors so wondering how / if others have taken on 0-day internally and made it faster by beefing up the hardware. Luis