From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Nominating Fengguang Wu - 0-day
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 01:33:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160728233327.GC3296@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160728230713.GB18980@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 07:07:13AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> btw, maybe some maintainers are already informed: 0-day statistics
> show that ~60% errors can be reported in 2 hours, ~90% errors are
> reported in 24 hours and there are 1% errors reported after 1 week.
If one were to take 0-day code an slap it on some internal big-iron
server, and prioritize work for a few developers (say SUSE would do
this for its developers) do you expect the turnaround time for
reports would be faster if we had bigger-meaner hardware ? These
days actually would like to get results back in a few minutes
for 90% of errors so wondering how / if others have taken on
0-day internally and made it faster by beefing up the hardware.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-28 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-25 19:01 Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-07-25 20:23 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-07-26 3:10 ` Vinod Koul
2016-07-26 8:16 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-07-26 8:56 ` Vinod Koul
2016-07-28 13:20 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-07-27 14:50 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-07-28 16:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-07-28 20:53 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-07-28 20:59 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-07-28 22:38 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-07-29 16:26 ` Vinod Koul
2016-07-28 23:07 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-07-28 23:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2016-07-29 0:09 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-07-29 15:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-07-30 17:05 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-07-30 17:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-07-31 6:35 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-07-31 17:32 ` Vinod Koul
2016-08-01 13:35 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-07-28 23:38 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-07-31 11:16 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-07-29 2:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-29 2:26 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-07-27 14:41 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-07-28 17:15 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-07-28 17:21 ` Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160728233327.GC3296@wotan.suse.de \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox