From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (smtp2.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.36]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1783183D for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0084.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.84]) by smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 907831DABC for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by smtpgrave08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCED7211140 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 20:10:10 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Laurent Pinchart Message-ID: <20160728201010.6d1ef149@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <367437209.fSUZRCC4cu@avalon> References: <57976941.2040308@roeck-us.net> <1469543609.120686.319.camel@infradead.org> <367437209.fSUZRCC4cu@avalon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: James Bottomley , Trond Myklebust , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] stable workflow List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:02:12 +0300 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > - The lack of a test infrastructure was a major reason for not developing > tests earlier. If we want developers to write and even submit test cases we > need to lower the barrier to entry. A proper infrastructure (with libraries, > locations where to submit test cases, documentation, examples, ...) will not > only make it more likely that test cases will be created and published, but > should also hopefully avoid the proliferation of incompatible test frameworks. Does tools/testing/selftests/ not satisfy this? -- Steve