Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Nominating Fengguang Wu - 0-day

[Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>]

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:23:43PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>On 25/07/2016 at 21:01:25 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote :
>>
>> It surprises Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> hasn't been nominated yet,
>> so I'd like to nominate him. The mechanical process should probably include in
>> the future a scrape for top Reported-by contributors.
>>
>
>That's a good point.
>
>> Fengguang's 0-day infrastructure is invaluable to day to day kernel
>> development, having him present would be great for any questions that may come
>> up. Getting a statistical overview / update of impact / any major architectural
>> changes of the 0-day infrastructure would also be very useful. If maintainers
>> are not yet using 0-day it would be great to hear why. If your contributors are
>> not using 0-day (I know some of you exist) I'd like to know why you don't use it,
>> I often run into issues on linux-next which at times I have to fix, if 0-day
>> would have been used a folowup fix would not have been needed.
>>
>
>Well, I think it would also help to know how the patch/git tree
>selection is done. Lately, I've been receiving less reports from 0-day
>and some issues were found by Arnd's autobuilders after hitting
>linux-next. I used to get report of compilation breakage 10-15 minutes
>after the patch submission.

Yeah sorry about that! There are many things that can impact 0-day
system's stability: regressions, hard disk replacement, proxy issues,
mailing list kicking off, vocations, etc. Which should improve over
time as we add monitoring and self-test facilities. On the other hand,
if you find such issues, please don't hesitate forwarding the error
emails to us, so that we can check and take action quickly.

Thanks,
Fengguang