From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21C4B2C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 06:04:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pokefinder.org (sauhun.de [89.238.76.85]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AAF6178 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 06:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 07:34:36 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Vinod Koul Message-ID: <20160727053433.GA1682@katana> References: <20160727030406.GU9681@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160727030406.GU9681@localhost> Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Dave Airlie , "Nikula, Jani" , Grant Likely , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] (group) maintainership models List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Okay one of the gripes I have is that it is a bit hard to compile arm > drivers. I regularly compile all drivers in subsystem I maintain and arm > ones are not always straightforward. Figuring our which config to use > for compile testing involves a bit of time, which I would like to avoid. ... > So if you have suggestions to improve my flow, I would like to hear > that, maybe I am doing something not right here... What I do to here when reviewing i2c patches: - at rc1 time, decompress all configs to somewhere - if a driver fails to build with the current config - get the filenames from the patch and assume .o are the objs - parse Makefiles for those obj files and hope there is a obj-$(CONFIG_xy)= attached to it - grep my decompressed configs for the CONFIG_xy symbol - use the found config Doesn't work 100% of course, but good enough for me. Also, the rise of COMPILE_TEST really helps that some config will do, so I encourage using it. Regards, Wolfram --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXmEfpAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2qCAP/36zpx01RpQ7Dw3Piv35Qq8L 4Ojs3enqtQtnOjGzyyhsLdd+zm6zIWAGrxLGwO3DtGacylrEwkB6EpBkHpspcuYo eDQJ0UDDPk+2YR6anbgrL0qWYHofTIRkFQhCBSMDJ5UUWOHawlYR48UkD+xL8/sX HyK2latlVK6RzlfkNpAAyRL+KTTIVMKGomz5SW1AIsycVBqPRBwG7eFyulK0h9PL MBMH03cdSK9HBebAp8dDBQfs4OXX1rXYgs+1TC07RdFYmLZ1U4gcVD5NEVMkDiRP ocLXmWQaexZna4/ZnDnqevuOZmTXe9UBeKKl11RCIoCE3k8AXK5VC7ridEVCQY58 oTfsVB+LUxYBeM74ExW8X5kj3staQ8OenP0ZQBC0sARq7JoH8xd5wHe33FYy/mx+ LQIM0eAYMtEmRswlJADpnjQBMGtjfIKLNCDQgkD9SXMYd70JytsthO/QxIXwjXiF HciqC7sudQcHNlb/tVZhDrJEe4VF//sYnEH5g8NKXGxYpKCPWtpM/JSo3s9sd4Hz XARUAL5ebUvJpnm9SBG/bciCtyfM1RwY998aBvATrRaMI1ggRuBeWLcmby26O9iW 6iZbSNR4QvFkhlS6jTxgoUcsGwGPIxDCd3BI8TxF/hMKh+P5JQzNKDHnt1ZEe/ZN hrdqV/cJCqhJj2avjkQe =Xu0i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd--