From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] (group) maintainership models
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 07:34:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160727053433.GA1682@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160727030406.GU9681@localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 988 bytes --]
> Okay one of the gripes I have is that it is a bit hard to compile arm
> drivers. I regularly compile all drivers in subsystem I maintain and arm
> ones are not always straightforward. Figuring our which config to use
> for compile testing involves a bit of time, which I would like to avoid.
...
> So if you have suggestions to improve my flow, I would like to hear
> that, maybe I am doing something not right here...
What I do to here when reviewing i2c patches:
- at rc1 time, decompress all configs to somewhere
- if a driver fails to build with the current config
- get the filenames from the patch and assume .o are the objs
- parse Makefiles for those obj files and hope there is
a obj-$(CONFIG_xy)=<obj> attached to it
- grep my decompressed configs for the CONFIG_xy symbol
- use the found config
Doesn't work 100% of course, but good enough for me. Also, the rise of
COMPILE_TEST really helps that some config will do, so I encourage using
it.
Regards,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-27 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-20 12:11 Daniel Vetter
2016-07-22 20:02 ` Darren Hart
2016-07-25 5:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-07-26 16:22 ` Darren Hart
2016-07-28 22:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-07-26 16:45 ` Olof Johansson
2016-07-27 3:04 ` Vinod Koul
2016-07-27 5:34 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2016-07-27 7:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-27 12:57 ` Vinod Koul
2016-07-27 14:22 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-27 17:15 ` Vinod Koul
2016-07-28 8:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-28 23:48 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-07-29 0:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-31 17:57 ` Vinod Koul
2016-08-01 6:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-01 7:36 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-08-01 14:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-02 4:46 ` Vinod Koul
2016-08-02 6:48 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-08-02 7:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-02 8:29 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-08-02 8:33 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-08-02 9:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-08-02 8:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-02 9:21 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-08-02 9:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-09-02 10:46 ` Vinod Koul
2016-09-02 17:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-02 20:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-09-02 20:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-02 20:43 ` Julia Lawall
2016-09-02 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-02 22:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-09-03 14:02 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-09-02 23:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-09-04 17:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-09-04 17:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-03 0:07 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-27 12:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-07-27 13:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-01 14:42 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-07 5:03 Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160727053433.GA1682@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox