From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 874D22C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 03:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89391249 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 03:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:40:07 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Alexandre Belloni Message-ID: <20160726031007.GH9681@localhost> References: <20160725190125.GS5537@wotan.suse.de> <20160725202343.GJ11405@piout.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160725202343.GJ11405@piout.net> Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Nominating Fengguang Wu - 0-day List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:23:43PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 25/07/2016 at 21:01:25 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote : > > > > It surprises Fengguang Wu hasn't been nominated yet, > > so I'd like to nominate him. The mechanical process should probably include in > > the future a scrape for top Reported-by contributors. > > > > That's a good point. > > > Fengguang's 0-day infrastructure is invaluable to day to day kernel > > development, having him present would be great for any questions that may come > > up. Getting a statistical overview / update of impact / any major architectural > > changes of the 0-day infrastructure would also be very useful. If maintainers > > are not yet using 0-day it would be great to hear why. If your contributors are > > not using 0-day (I know some of you exist) I'd like to know why you don't use it, > > I often run into issues on linux-next which at times I have to fix, if 0-day > > would have been used a folowup fix would not have been needed. I am using it a lot :) > Well, I think it would also help to know how the patch/git tree > selection is done. Lately, I've been receiving less reports from 0-day > and some issues were found by Arnd's autobuilders after hitting > linux-next. I used to get report of compilation breakage 10-15 minutes > after the patch submission. Pls check if the mailing list is still subscribed. I had the same issue and found that his ID was kicked off from the list, which is quite typical w/ Intel accounts & vger. Since work is done by scripts, people may not have noticed. -- ~Vinod