From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 216EF9C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 19:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E41D617B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 19:01:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87705AC7A for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 19:01:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 21:01:25 +0200 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Message-ID: <20160725190125.GS5537@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] Nominating Fengguang Wu - 0-day List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , It surprises Fengguang Wu hasn't been nominated yet, so I'd like to nominate him. The mechanical process should probably include in the future a scrape for top Reported-by contributors. Fengguang's 0-day infrastructure is invaluable to day to day kernel development, having him present would be great for any questions that may come up. Getting a statistical overview / update of impact / any major architectural changes of the 0-day infrastructure would also be very useful. If maintainers are not yet using 0-day it would be great to hear why. If your contributors are not using 0-day (I know some of you exist) I'd like to know why you don't use it, I often run into issues on linux-next which at times I have to fix, if 0-day would have been used a folowup fix would not have been needed. Luis