From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BB75258 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 01:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0F1B107 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 01:18:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:19:05 +0900 From: Greg KH To: Alex Shi Message-ID: <20160714011905.GA20986@kroah.com> References: <1468058721.2557.9.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <0ED98206-0A66-48A4-B5A4-A0BC53FDBF05@primarydata.com> <1468114447.2333.12.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1468115770.2333.15.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <718BE1FD-6169-4205-A905-53F997D5943A@primarydata.com> <5785C80F.4030707@linaro.org> <20160713090739.GA18037@kroah.com> <578635F6.9040601@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <578635F6.9040601@linaro.org> Cc: James Bottomley , Trond Myklebust , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] kernel unit testing List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 09:37:10PM +0900, Alex Shi wrote: > > > On 07/13/2016 06:07 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 01:48:15PM +0900, Alex Shi wrote: > > > I am thinking if it's possible to share an basic tree which include some > > > widely wanted backporting features. That could share the testing and review, > > > then will reduce bugs much more. > > Like LTSI already does today? :) > > It looks we share some basic ideas on backporting part. But industry need > much more backporting features. and new features which out of upstream > aren't started from here, since it's a upstream quality without more eyes in > community. I have no idea what you mean by this. Please give specific examples of what you have problems with. thanks, greg k-h