On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:24:55AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 06:17:18PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Probably also worth mentioning that this was one of the blockers for
> > getting kernelci.org testing Greg's queue for quite a while - it only
> > knows how to consume git branches.

> Kevin ended up pulling git branches from my repository, so that wasn't an
> absolute blocker. One key advantage of having the queue in git is that it is

I'm aware of that - obviously it's possible to go in both directions but
it does mean that someone needs to do the translation which is a bit
less obvious than the translation in the other direction.

> always consistent - the quilt queue was not always in sync with the -stable
> baseline, especially right after a new stable release. Another advantage
> is that the git repository can be tested by 0day.

Right, it's just generally more likely that tooling will be able to
consume git than anything else.