Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Stable and delay backports

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>]

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 09:02:35AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> I'm still not clear, even after all the discussion, whether there's any
> value left to annotating the cc to stable with a delay backport.  I'm
> getting ready to post a fix to our block size calculations which make
> them completely accurate instead of within 5% like they were before.
> Technically this is a bug fix because people get distressed even over
> apparently losing 5% of their space, so it will have to be backported,
> but the algorithm has increased in complexity, so it would be better to
> incubate in main line for a while to make sure there are no further
> complaints.
> 
> So the question: I think I heard Greg say you're automatically delaying
> merge window backports anyway, so there's no real need to add a separate
> delay tag, or is there?

If you want to ensure that I don't instantly pick it up, sure, put a
"add to stable after XXX" marking on the patch, or do like Jens
suggested, either will work.

thanks,

greg k-h