From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9831267 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 04:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from theia.8bytes.org (8bytes.org [81.169.241.247]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1D0479 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 04:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 05:38:24 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Andy Lutomirski Message-ID: <20151026043823.GD27420@8bytes.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Paolo Bonzini , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , m.smarduch@samsung.com Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Short topic: virtio vs IOMMU List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 07:55:31PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > It would be nice to nail down how virtio should interact with IOMMUs > on the emulated busses. A bunch of the relevant maintainers are > around, and a short slot for this topic might make sense. > > The goal would be to figure out how to accomplish something like this series: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/log/?h=virtio_ring_xen > > but in a way that would actually work on all supported platforms > without breaking backward compatibility or killing performance. I am interested in that as well. Joerg