From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:53:45 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: "Luck, Tony" Message-ID: <20151021125345.76cc4adc@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F32B5A00F@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20151020220328.GA21941@thunk.org> <20151021145626.GD2165@thunk.org> <5627AD56.7050500@roeck-us.net> <20151021160907.GM32054@sirena.org.uk> <5627BF30.4080703@roeck-us.net> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F32B5A00F@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Kernel Summit Agenda -- 2nd draft List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:24:19 +0000 "Luck, Tony" wrote: > > is quite high ? I don't know, and I don't really care that much since my > > ultimate goal is to get problems fixed, not to get my patches accepted. > > Should we include these words of wisdom in Documentation/SubmittingPatches? The docs maintainer will happily accept patches...:) FWIW, something to this effect can be found at the end of Documentation/development-process/6.Followthrough, but I suspect few people get that far. jon