From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82F3C90 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 17:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 019FF16E for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 17:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wijq8 with SMTP id q8so20195894wij.0 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:02:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:02:58 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: "Paul E. McKenney" Message-ID: <20151016170256.GA1432@lerouge> References: <20151012184051.GB29127@thunk.org> <20151012204005.GI3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151012204005.GI3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Peter Zijlstra , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Chris Metcalf , Christoph Lameter , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [BELATED CORE TOPIC] context tracking / nohz / RCU state List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 01:40:05PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:40:51PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > This thread had fairly intense discussion for two days, but then went dead. > > > > Do folks think this is worth discussing at the kernel summit? > > I am very interested in discussing this. Of course, part of that > interest is due to the direct involvement of RCU code. Please don't talk about this without me. Context tracking is deeply involved and I haven't been invited to kernel summit.