From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E37E1F46 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 22:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com (mail-pa0-f43.google.com [209.85.220.43]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FE5F16C for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 22:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pacgr6 with SMTP id gr6so2188132pac.3 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:08:49 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Kees Cook Message-ID: <20150827150849.36404678@urahara> In-Reply-To: References: <1440446941.2201.32.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20150824235409.GD13446@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: James Bottomley , Emily Ratliff , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] grsecurity and kernel hardening List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Looks like grsecurity has had a turn for the worse http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/08/27/grsecurity/ But can't say that I blame him for being mad about vendors using without giving back...