From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <broonie@sirena.org.uk>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 050A6405
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:24:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk (mezzanine.sirena.org.uk
	[106.187.55.193])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 807AF8F
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:24:40 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:24:15 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Message-ID: <20150729122415.GA20130@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20436.1438090619@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
	<20150728183610.GB5307@cloud>
	<1438109061.5441.202.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
	<20150728185428.GD5307@cloud> <20150729115710.GB3866@sirena.org.uk>
	<1438171372.26511.38.camel@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1438171372.26511.38.camel@infradead.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>, mcgrof@gmail.com,
	ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, jkkm@jkkm.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Firmware signing
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>


--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:02:52PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:

> It's also not about "more rapid than the kernel release cycle", but
> just about "not 100% strictly nailed to the kernel release cycle".

Indeed, and that's the release cycle of the kernel that people are
running rather than the upstream kernel too.

--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVuMXpAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQVfMH/RckasxT4kr578gTzGPGpctY
1mu7VkLe0wWA6t7W+UjSUIBUbcCNrcswXqd1gpgFLxOSxLx2hkN3OKS2jBrm+ckh
e2RVAFOCwkKeSLTTkOUy7vLaWPkivAemHVWjMkpxQRYHwGd5SMBqKWejW9+cWcRZ
A0Sz9YPrCuYMPp+IPV7p/mHwsX9JUJr0K5+vbGeEzY6uZhQDQvFTkcuILbULfIiC
449u3qBQGl+jCj8EgXYqv4NdqAA2lsGNW6tUqei4el8YIjjDlEviRatZXiN87Fko
W0T5a/FdCovWlsajyFbumlllcxI7luA+4PrJPrCVX3x1LanGYdo5K/ek99bnzIc=
=SZUb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2--