From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (smtp2.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.36]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2303488 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:05:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0074.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.74]) by smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8101DF39 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:04:57 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: NeilBrown Message-ID: <20150722090457.45562610@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20150721185436.20b97c47@notabene.brown> References: <20150717101151.5d5bc86d@lwn.net> <20150717133712.42c82add@gandalf.local.home> <20150717190223.GB1499@cloud> <20150717154326.6f129bc4@gandalf.local.home> <20150717202412.GA1856@cloud> <20150717163903.67747d86@gandalf.local.home> <20150717204856.GA2048@cloud> <20150717165501.62ed4e04@gandalf.local.home> <1437376105.8968.14.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20150720084420.GA11454@x> <1437384215.8968.28.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1437386699.22996.10.camel@infradead.org> <1437388227.8968.34.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1437390546.22996.27.camel@infradead.org> <55ADA7C1.3050809@huawei.com> <20150721185436.20b97c47@notabene.brown> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: James Bottomley , Dan Carpenter , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Jason Cooper Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Recruitment (Reviewers, Testers, Maintainers, Hobbyists) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 18:54:36 +1000 NeilBrown wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:00:33 +0800 Zefan Li wrote: > > > > Then it should just be case of of asking Stephen to "put this tree last > > > in linux-next", and Linus to "pull this one last, right before > > > releasing -rc1". And getting the timing right for the script to run. > > > > > > > This makes git-blame less useful, and that's one of the reasons some > > maintainers don't like trivial cleanups. > > Sounds like we need to propose an enhancement to "git-blame"... > No need. I use git blame all the time. Trivial patches don't bother me. $ git blame foo.c $ git show abc123 Sees that it's a trivial fix $ git blame abc123~1 foo.c $ git show def890 More changes I don't care about $ git blame def890~1 foo.c $ git show cde456 Ah! that's the change I was looking for! -- Steve