From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (smtp2.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.36]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F23ABB3 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0116.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.116]) by smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EBB1DCD1 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by smtpgrave03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14E528FC19 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:41:51 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Greg KH Message-ID: <20150715154151.34959ffc@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20150713205125.GA26074@kroah.com> References: <55A1407E.5080800@oracle.com> <55A26C5B.8060007@oracle.com> <20150713105210.6e367f4b@noble> <20150713205125.GA26074@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Sasha Levin , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Issues with stable process List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:51:25 -0700 Greg KH wrote: > So I don't think that a manditory 2 week waiting period is going to help > out much here, sorry. The exact same thing can be said about having patches brew in -next for 2 weeks (or whatever) before going to Linus. If issues are not caught in Linus's tree after two weeks, I highly doubt two weeks in -next will be any better. -- Steve