ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
	<ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Issues with stable process
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:26:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150715092620.GD22609@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A563A2.6010601@oracle.com>

On Tue 14-07-15 15:31:46, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 07/14/2015 03:18 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> wrote:
> >> > On 07/14/2015 11:56 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>>>> >>>> If the issue being fixed is serious enough to take out substantial
> >>>>>>> >>>> > > portion of our test coverage or affect a lot of other development
> >>>>>>> >>>> > > usage then that's really disruptive to other work, it impacts things
> >>>>>>> >>>> > > like bisection for example.  A strong rule does nobody any good,
> >>>>>>> >>>> > > it's overkill for the problem.
> >>>>> >>> > If there's an issue that causes that effect then the original commit that
> >>>>> >>> > caused it should be reverted rather than introducing an untested fix right
> >>>>> >>> > away.
> >>>>> >>> > Obviously not a hard rule, but it should be the case in general.
> >>> >> That's still sending a change of course which was what was being
> >>> >> objected to.
> >> >
> >> > Lesser of two evils? I can't really come up with a safer solution rather than
> >> > reverting it (not blindly, the revert will need an ack too, and that's assuming
> >> > that the fix is not trivial).
> > And that it can be reverted, i.e. there are no later commits that depend on it.
> 
> Right, this it tricky - one would need to audit the commit the depend on it for
> correctness knowing that a dependency has a bug.
> 
> The premise here is that if we're not dealing with trivial breakage, reverting is
> generally safer than fixing, but for some reason we rarely take that path.

Frankly at least in my experience reverting usually happens if:

1) no other commits depend on the buggy one
2) the state after the commit is actually worse than before it (sometimes
you fix 95% of the problem and forget to fix some corner case - then
reverting would be counterproductive).

So at least in areas where I usually work things work fine in this regard.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-15  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-11 16:12 Sasha Levin
2015-07-12 10:02 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-12 13:32   ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-13  0:52     ` NeilBrown
2015-07-13  3:32       ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-13  4:27       ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-13  5:10         ` NeilBrown
2015-07-13 22:55           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-13 18:21         ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-13 18:51           ` Mark Brown
2015-07-15 14:52             ` Olof Johansson
2015-07-15 15:59               ` Guenter Roeck
2015-07-15 16:03               ` Greg KH
2015-07-15 16:15                 ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-15 16:40                   ` Greg KH
2015-07-15 19:34                     ` Josh Boyer
2015-07-15 21:21                     ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-15 22:34                       ` Greg KH
2015-07-15 22:40                         ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-16  3:36                           ` Greg KH
2015-07-17  0:52                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-16  9:06                   ` Zefan Li
2015-07-16 18:14                 ` Olof Johansson
2015-07-14  0:42           ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-14  1:02             ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-14  2:00               ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-14  2:28               ` Jonathan Corbet
2015-07-14  3:48                 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-14  7:14                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-14 11:03                 ` James Bottomley
2015-07-14 13:29                   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-14 20:17                     ` James Bottomley
2015-07-14 20:45                       ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 22:12                       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-14 22:36                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-01  8:44                   ` Jani Nikula
2015-09-01 20:52                     ` Greg KH
2015-09-01 21:00                       ` Sasha Levin
2015-09-01 21:08                         ` Jiri Kosina
2015-09-01 22:47                           ` Sasha Levin
2015-09-02 10:10                         ` Luis Henriques
2015-07-16  0:53                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-16 11:50                   ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14  3:42               ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-14  7:03               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-14 10:46               ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 13:57                 ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-14 15:25                   ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 15:32                     ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-14 15:38                       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-14 15:53                         ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-14 16:02                           ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-14 19:30                             ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-14 19:38                               ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-15  1:49                               ` NeilBrown
2015-07-15  2:09                                 ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-15  2:28                                   ` NeilBrown
2015-07-15 10:13                                     ` James Bottomley
2015-07-15 23:24                                       ` NeilBrown
2015-07-16  1:05                                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-16  1:43                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2015-07-16  1:25                                         ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-16  9:19                                           ` James Bottomley
2015-07-16 12:33                                             ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-08-03  8:32                                             ` Fengguang Wu
2015-07-14 15:56                       ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 19:01                         ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-14 19:18                           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-14 19:31                             ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-15  9:26                               ` Jan Kara [this message]
2015-07-16 12:53                           ` Mark Brown
2015-07-13  9:22       ` Jan Kara
2015-07-13 20:51       ` Greg KH
2015-07-14  0:51         ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-14  2:46         ` NeilBrown
2015-07-15 19:41         ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-15 20:14           ` James Bottomley
2015-07-12 15:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-07-13 10:15 ` Zefan Li
2015-07-13 16:12   ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-14 10:08     ` Zefan Li
2015-07-14 14:00       ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-15  0:01         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150715092620.GD22609@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox