From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85303BAC for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk (mezzanine.sirena.org.uk [106.187.55.193]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07900185 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:38:31 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Fengguang Wu Message-ID: <20150714153831.GZ11162@sirena.org.uk> References: <20150707092434.GE11162@sirena.org.uk> <559BEF61.8050904@roeck-us.net> <20150708075409.GJ4341@mwanda> <20150708095207.GN11162@sirena.org.uk> <20150712111547.GB24634@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <20150713183441.GJ11162@sirena.org.uk> <20150714142241.GB24191@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8PwxOTgimcLqatFW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150714142241.GB24191@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> Cc: Shuah Khan , Kevin Hilman , Tyler Baker , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Testing List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --8PwxOTgimcLqatFW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:22:41PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 07:34:41PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > Latency seems like it might be an issue here, when I say I'm not seeing > > things that's issues coming up in the -next build before they're > > reported by 0day so they might well get fixed before 0day catches up. > Ah linux-next happen to have lower priority and can take many hours to > finish. I'll increase its priority due to its importance. This was actually things in my trees that get merged into -next (or which Stephen tries to merge into -next and finds problems with) prior to being reported by 0day. > > For me personally it'd be more interesting to be able to get them on > > demand (eg, from a web page) than e-mailed, or e-mailed by a human > > (possibly with fixes!). The kernelci.org reporting does a lot of this > > but doesn't cover anything except raw compiler warnings. > It should be mostly equivalent if you direct such emails to a local > mbox and check it on demand. :) Well, they don't go away automatically when fixed then... --8PwxOTgimcLqatFW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVpSz2AAoJECTWi3JdVIfQ3yYH/jrF1V7lNxFPZP2WHYN1mdna jARyJP0NMlNCpgtUzVs75nfIgj5KYtOjYcCjE/gCXmMu0SMC2z7U8KpD9xjQcWQj 6skxXuz9ldI/fIRhsdxjsOj7Z6HCxkin9UxuveAACH6buPQAVA/4g0MUZvcUuEsI MbW6QG/r2969vNz67uGCeGpnHnOd2XIUJICXMkABvDd40AUsMQ8QlH/o2Ph/0QeK Kgk1Y6Ex9hBufl6oBrgRfCKudvUUJ2CPAky5Bi4oWkNC3Ab/hEYtnB9N85GEUdKi GXdfS64txkOyLk4rU+Bv7NDAoWBaVMu5ok09dj8gkE58HYPkjIwDDs4qCEXT9N8= =wMhM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8PwxOTgimcLqatFW--