From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1075BB6
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 14 Jul 2015 04:38:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com
	[209.85.220.45])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B149A32
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 14 Jul 2015 04:38:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pactm7 with SMTP id tm7so219044255pac.2
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 13 Jul 2015 21:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:08:03 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <20150714043803.GA3290@sudip-PC>
References: <20150708080032.CE89E4306F@saturn.retrosnub.co.uk>
	<20150708145315.29030a75@gandalf.local.home>
	<20150710181409.GA30145@treble.redhat.com>
	<1436576450.27924.59.camel@stgolabs.net>
	<20150712034824.GA4236@treble.hsd1.ky.comcast.net>
	<20150712052317.GB15346@x>
	<20150712122823.GA4366@treble.redhat.com>
	<20150713140113.GB4341@mwanda>
	<20150713143331.GA21079@quack.suse.cz>
	<20150713162439.GI4289@mwanda>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150713162439.GI4289@mwanda>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Recruitment (Reviewers, Testers,
 Maintainers, Hobbyists)
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 07:28:25PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 04:33:31PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Mon 13-07-15 17:20:47, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 07:28:23AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> 
> This happened hours ago in staging.  Someone sent a buggy patch and
> reviewers spotted the bug but no one got credit.
> 
> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/2015-July/072662.html
> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/2015-July/072668.html
> 
> Imagine how special Patrick would feel if we gave him a nice
> "With-fix-from: Patrick Farrell <paf@cray.com>" tag.  :)  Also the other
> rule would be that only the first person to report the bug gets the
> credit (Sorry, Sudip).
Doesn't matter. I am a volunteer and contributing here is not part of
my dayjob. I do it because I like doing it.
>The next version of the patch had a process
> problem which Sudip noticed as well but that still doesn't earn a
> with-fix-from tag.
Then will the first reviewer always get the credit? Suppose a hypothetial
situation where v1 is just having a bug like the one you mentioned,
reviewer X points that out so he gets "With-fix-from:", but v2 has a more
serious problem and results in build failure and reviewer Y points that out
and v3 is the final patch that is accepted. So now who will get
"With-fix-from:" ?

regards
sudip