From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB135BB6 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BC407C for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:26:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Peter =?iso-8859-15?q?H=FCwe?= To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 21:28:21 +0200 References: <201507130038.01474.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> <20150713123750.52d8a14d@gandalf.local.home> <1436806006.20909.59.camel@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <1436806006.20909.59.camel@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201507132128.22178.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> Cc: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE-TOPIC] Documentation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am Montag, 13. Juli 2015, 18:46:46 schrieb David Woodhouse: > 1. It should have been made simpler, or > 2. There should be an explanation *right* there in the C file. > > Those should be caught in review. But also we have tons of undocumented obscure legacy code which unfortunately won't get new review cycles. Peter