From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3240AAE for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 02:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com (e35.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.153]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AEABEB for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 02:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from /spool/local by e35.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:04:14 -0600 Received: from b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.16]) by d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C7B19D8040 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:55:11 -0600 (MDT) Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t6D24B2P56623150 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:04:11 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t6D24B0P022727 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:04:11 -0600 Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:04:07 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Peter =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=FCwe?= Message-ID: <20150713020407.GP3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <201507122355.20513.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <201507122355.20513.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Follow-Up(s) on previous Kernel Summits | KSummit Archive Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 11:55:19PM +0200, Peter Hüwe wrote: > Hi, > > I'm reading along ksummit-discuss for quite a while and I definitely see a lot > of topics reoccurring each year -- also a lot of arguments and standpoints are > similar each year :) > > Does it make sense to reserve a slot to revisit the topics of the previous KS, > check their status and the agreed actions back then? > Tinyfication, Stable Flow, 2038... just to name a few. > > > > > > And a bit related I just wanted to point to Paul McKenneys great summary of > previous KSs: > > http://ftp.be.debian.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/paulmck/LKS/ And I do plan to summarize again this year. I was out last week, so have not yet started. ;-) Thanx, Paul